Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> Alvaro Herrera wrote:
>
>>What was the rule for increasing the first number after just before
>>7.0?
>
>
> That was just to avoid having to release a 6.6.6, which Jan had clearly
> been working towards. :-)
>
> Seriously, major version jumps correspond to epoch-like changes, like
> when the code moved out of Berkeley, or when we switched from bug
> fixing to adding features. Maybe the next epoch would be after a
> hostile takeover of firebird. But right now I see no epoch change,
> just a potential for confusing users. Consistency and humbleness can
> be a virtue.
Have a win32 native implementation is not a epoch change about you ?
Regards
Gaetano Mendola
