Re: win32 version info - Mailing list pgsql-patches

From Peter Eisentraut
Subject Re: win32 version info
Date
Msg-id 200407270016.42186.peter_e@gmx.net
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: win32 version info  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-patches
Tom Lane wrote:
> I was originally thinking of somehow migrating the executable build
> rules into a single pattern rule, but given the lack of any suffix on
> executable names it's not clear how to use a pattern rule for the
> purpose.

You can write a rule for that using

%: %.o

but...

> And the existing rules are diverse enough that it might be
> a real pain to construct such a pattern rule anyway.

...is the problem.

--
Peter Eisentraut
http://developer.postgresql.org/~petere/


pgsql-patches by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Function to kill backend
Next
From: Alvaro Herrera
Date:
Subject: [subxacts] Fixing TODO items