Re: pg_config - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Peter Eisentraut
Subject Re: pg_config
Date
Msg-id 200407201825.38126.peter_e@gmx.net
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: pg_config  ("Andrew Dunstan" <andrew@dunslane.net>)
List pgsql-hackers
Andrew Dunstan wrote:
> To that extent is it not broken by relocated installations that we
> have now made some provision for?

Well, then it should be fixed to take relocated installations into 
account.

Relocatable installations are by nature a pretty broken feature.  When 
you use pg_config to locate, say, libpq, then compile your third-party 
package, and then move libpq somewhere else, nothing can save you 
(except moving libpq back).  At least on Unix, relocatable 
installations are a walking cane when you need parallel installations 
for upgrades, but they'll never work reliably in general.

-- 
Peter Eisentraut
http://developer.postgresql.org/~petere/



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Steve Atkins
Date:
Subject: Re: localhost redux
Next
From: Greg Stark
Date:
Subject: Re: Why we really need timelines *now* in PITR