Peter,
> There is no conflict. If a company calls itself PostgreSQL, Inc., then
> it will logically use the PostgreSQL elephant as its logo. If you feel
> there is a conflict then the conflict is really a company calling
> itself PostgreSQL, Inc. That was not particularly wise, but I don't
> really consider it a problem. But the logo is really a much smaller
> subset problem.
You missed part of Lamar's commentary: apparently the BEH logo belonged to
PostgreSQL Inc. and we started using it, not the other way around. So the
logo is theirs and we copied it.
Which *definitely* wasn't smart.
--
-Josh Berkus
Aglio Database Solutions
San Francisco
