Pavel Stehule wrote:
> >
> > An 'END SUB' after a 'BEGIN SUB' in plpgsql could be required, and could
> > mean start/end block and subtx. I do not really see a downside.
> > But, it would imho only make sense if the 'END SUB' would commit sub
> > or abort sub iff subtx is in aborted state (see my prev posting)
> >
> > Andreas
> >
> Hello,
>
> is good idea use keywords "begin sub" and "end sub"? Programmers like me
> will be an problems with reading and writing SP, because begin sub and
> mostly end sub are keywords from visual basic with different sense.
> BEGIN SUBTRANSACTION and END SUBTRANSACTION is longer but more readable
I think we agreed on BEGIN NESTED/COMMIT NESTED, and START NESTED
TRANSACTION and COMMIT NESTED TRANSACTION.
-- Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us pgman@candle.pha.pa.us | (610)
359-1001+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road + Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square,
Pennsylvania19073
