Re: compile errors in new PL/Pler - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Marc G. Fournier
Subject Re: compile errors in new PL/Pler
Date
Msg-id 20040705231323.P71486@ganymede.hub.org
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: compile errors in new PL/Pler  ("Joshua D. Drake" <jd@commandprompt.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Fri, 2 Jul 2004, Joshua D. Drake wrote:

>
>> So we have three choices as I see it:
>> 1) revert the change
>> 2) require some minimally recent version of perl
>> 3) fix the issue in place
>> 
>> Preferences?
>> 
>> Joshua/Andrew -- do you want to take a shot at making this work on perl 
>> 5.00503?
>
> I personally don't have any desire to make this work on a version of perl 
> that the perl community itself suggests that you should upgrade.

Well, backing it out is always an option, since the old version apparently 
did work *shrug*

Personally, rather have the new on in there though ... :)

----
Marc G. Fournier           Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org)
Email: scrappy@hub.org           Yahoo!: yscrappy              ICQ: 7615664


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Alvaro Herrera
Date:
Subject: Re: Nested Transactions, Abort All
Next
From: Christopher Kings-Lynne
Date:
Subject: Re: Bug with view definitions?