Re: compile errors in new PL/Pler - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Joshua D. Drake
Subject Re: compile errors in new PL/Pler
Date
Msg-id 40E591F6.70607@commandprompt.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: compile errors in new PL/Pler  (Joe Conway <mail@joeconway.com>)
Responses Re: compile errors in new PL/Pler  ("Andrew Dunstan" <andrew@dunslane.net>)
Re: compile errors in new PL/Pler  ("Marc G. Fournier" <scrappy@postgresql.org>)
List pgsql-hackers
> So we have three choices as I see it:
> 1) revert the change
> 2) require some minimally recent version of perl
> 3) fix the issue in place
>
> Preferences?
>
> Joshua/Andrew -- do you want to take a shot at making this work on perl
> 5.00503?

I personally don't have any desire to make this work on a version of
perl that the perl community itself suggests that you should upgrade.

Perl 5.00503 is RedHat 6.2 genre... That is scary old.

I believe even RedHat 7.3 came with Perl 5.6 and that is old as well.

Sincerely,

Joshua D. Drake


>
> Joe


--
Command Prompt, Inc., home of Mammoth PostgreSQL - S/ODBC and S/JDBC
Postgresql support, programming shared hosting and dedicated hosting.
+1-503-667-4564 - jd@commandprompt.com - http://www.commandprompt.com
Mammoth PostgreSQL Replicator. Integrated Replication for PostgreSQL

Attachment

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Thomas Swan
Date:
Subject: Re: Nested Transactions, Abort All
Next
From: "Andrew Dunstan"
Date:
Subject: Re: compile errors in new PL/Pler