pgsql-server: Okay, I've had it with answering newbie questions about - Mailing list pgsql-committers

From tgl@svr1.postgresql.org (Tom Lane)
Subject pgsql-server: Okay, I've had it with answering newbie questions about
Date
Msg-id 20040704024919.52C37D1B1D5@svr1.postgresql.org
Whole thread Raw
List pgsql-committers
Log Message:
-----------
Okay, I've had it with answering newbie questions about why plpgsql
FOR loops are giving weird syntax errors.  Restructure parsing of FOR
loops so that the integer-loop-vs-query-loop decision is driven off
the presence of '..' between IN and LOOP, rather than the presence
of a matching record/row variable name.  Hopefully this will make the
behavior a bit more transparent.

Modified Files:
--------------
    pgsql-server/doc/src/sgml:
        plpgsql.sgml (r1.38 -> r1.39)
        (http://developer.postgresql.org/cvsweb.cgi/pgsql-server/doc/src/sgml/plpgsql.sgml.diff?r1=1.38&r2=1.39)
    pgsql-server/src/pl/plpgsql/src:
        gram.y (r1.56 -> r1.57)
        (http://developer.postgresql.org/cvsweb.cgi/pgsql-server/src/pl/plpgsql/src/gram.y.diff?r1=1.56&r2=1.57)

pgsql-committers by date:

Previous
From: tgl@svr1.postgresql.org (Tom Lane)
Date:
Subject: pgsql-server: Fix no-longer-correct bit-pushing in
Next
From: meskes@svr1.postgresql.org (Michael Meskes)
Date:
Subject: pgsql-server: Made sure SET DESCRIPTOR accepts all data types including