On Fri, Jul 02, 2004 at 22:30:05 +0800, Christopher Kings-Lynne <chriskl@familyhealth.com.au> wrote:
> >>Well, if we add them (and they would be very useful I reckon) should we
> >>ensure there's an obvious PG naming thing happening?
>
> Why are they useful???? If you want PG specific stuff then use the PG
> specific catalogs!!!
The information schema could be used to provide a more stable interface.
The pg catalog changes from release to release and it would be nice to
be able to write code which is more future proof.
