Re: VACUUM Question - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Bill Moran
Subject Re: VACUUM Question
Date
Msg-id 20040604154045.14016347.wmoran@potentialtech.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: VACUUM Question  (Rick Gigger <rick@alpinenetworking.com>)
Responses Re: VACUUM Question  (Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@dcc.uchile.cl>)
List pgsql-general
Rick Gigger <rick@alpinenetworking.com> wrote:

> >>One more question; on one server the Vacuum Analyze before the insert takes
> >>approx. 2min after that the same command takes 15min.
> >
> >
> > You might try a VACUUM FULL sometime when you can deal with 15min of downtime
> > or so. Actually it would probably be longer. Perhaps the table that's taking
> > 15min has a ton of extra dead tuples left over from the fsm settings being too
> > low and/or vacuum being too infrequent.
>
> Does VACUUM FULL just lock entire tables and thus cause you to
> essentially have downtime on that database because it doesn't respond
> quickly or do you actually have to shut down postgres to safely do a
> vacuum full?

The former.  You don't shut the database server down, but it won't be
responsive while vacuum full is running.

--
Bill Moran
Potential Technologies
http://www.potentialtech.com

pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Rick Gigger
Date:
Subject: Re: VACUUM Question
Next
From: "Tim Penhey"
Date:
Subject: Backup and Restore of PostgreSQL