Re: Memory usage on subselect - Mailing list pgsql-sql

From Alexander M. Pravking
Subject Re: Memory usage on subselect
Date
Msg-id 20040523183249.GC54296@dyatel.antar.bryansk.ru
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Memory usage on subselect  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: Memory usage on subselect
List pgsql-sql
On Sun, May 23, 2004 at 12:28:18PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> "Alexander M. Pravking" <fduch@antar.bryansk.ru> writes:
> > I've got a memory usage problem when I try to do a subselect on the same
> > table as the main select (PostgreSQL 7.3.4 on FreeBSD). Here's my query:
> > ...
> > The "services" table is indexed only on "id" column and has about a
> > thousand tuples. sreq(integer, text, timestamptz) is a strict immutable
> > function written in SQL.
> 
> IIRC, there were intraquery memory leaks associated with SQL-language
> functions until fairly recently.  Can you try your problem case on 7.4?
> Or see if you can rewrite the sreq function in plpgsql.

Thanks, Tom, both 7.4.1 and plpgsql function on 7.3.4 work well. However,
plpgsql function is a little slower, but that's another story.

I also tried to turn off IMMUTABLE for the function, but it did not
affect memory usage on 7.3.4.

BTW, after cancelling the original query postgres freed all the memory,
and used ~7M again, so the leak was not "forever".


Good luck, thansk again ;)

-- 
Fduch M. Pravking


pgsql-sql by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Memory usage on subselect
Next
From: Dan Field
Date:
Subject: Re: Memory usage on subselect