Re: Call for 7.5 feature completion - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Marc G. Fournier
Subject Re: Call for 7.5 feature completion
Date
Msg-id 20040519214832.Q5739@ganymede.hub.org
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Call for 7.5 feature completion  (Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com>)
Responses Re: Call for 7.5 feature completion  (Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Wed, 19 May 2004, Josh Berkus wrote:

> Tom,
>
> > The main downside of testing a snapshot, as I see it, is that the
> > snapshot is virtually certain not to be initdb-compatible with either
> > the previous release or the upcoming one.  Mini-releases would have
> > that problem too, and so I don't really see what they add in terms of
> > testability.
>
> The main purpose of mini-releases would be to make testing more accessable to
> newbies who find anon-CVS intimidating.

what is wrong with the nightly snapshots that are created?

----
Marc G. Fournier           Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org)
Email: scrappy@hub.org           Yahoo!: yscrappy              ICQ: 7615664


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: "Marc G. Fournier"
Date:
Subject: Core vs non-Core (Was: Re: Call for 7.5 feature completion)
Next
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: pg_type oid's do they change from version to version