Hans-J�rgen Sch�nig wrote:
> > All the clients that I deal with on a daily basis generally care about is
> > performance ... that is generally what they upgrade for ... so, my
> > 'educated guess' based on real world users is that Win32, PITR and nested
> > transactions are not important ... tablespaces, I have one client that has
> > asked about something *similar* to it, but tablespaces, for him, doesn't
> > come close to what they would like to see ...
> >
> > So, my 'educated guess' is different then yours is ... does that make
> > yours wrong? Nope ... just means we have different sample sets to work
> > with ...
> >
>
>
> Interesting.
> We have made COMPLETELY different experiences.
>
> There is one question people ask me daily: "When can we have sychronous
> replication and PITR?".
> Performance is not a problem here. People are more interested in
> stability and "enterprise" features such as those I have mentioned above.
>
> I am still wondering about two things:
> Somebody has posted a 2PC patch - I haven't seen too many comments
He is waiting for nested transactions to be committed so he can merge
his work in.
> Somebody has posted sync multimaster replication (PgCluster) - nobody
> has commented on that. Maybe I am the only one who has ever tried it ...
I think it should be on gborg.
-- Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us pgman@candle.pha.pa.us | (610)
359-1001+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road + Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square,
Pennsylvania19073
