Marc G. Fournier wrote:
> > Agreed, but you are a "me too", not a huge percentage of our userbase.
>
> How do you know? Have you polled our complete userbase?
>
> > Basically, after 6-7 months of development, I want more than a vacuum
> > patch and a new cache replacement policy. I want something big, in
> > fact, several big things.
>
> Most likely won't happen, since what is considered big by you isn't
> necessarily what is considered big by someone else ... as Hannu, and I
> believe, Jan, have so far pointed out to you ...
I can't poll for everything. I make my own educated guesses.
For a small percentage, vacuum delay and ARC are significant. For a
larger percentage, PITR, Win32, tablespaces, and nested transactions are
significant. I don't need to take a poll for that, and a "me too"
doesn't change that fact.
To say otherwise is to pretend that all our enhancements are of equal
significance. Sure, for a given individual some are very important, but
in the aggregate things are pretty easy to guess.
-- Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us pgman@candle.pha.pa.us | (610)
359-1001+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road + Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square,
Pennsylvania19073
