Tom Lane wrote:
> Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us> writes:
> > At a minimum, we should indicate we dropped the cluster on the index.
>
> [shrug] If you're going to make me do that, I might as well reinstall
> the bit on the new index. The code's problem is it doesn't know that
> any of the indexes it dropped were clustered, and finding that out is
> 90% of the issue.
>
> What I want to know is whether it is sensible to mark the revised index
> as clustered, given that its semantics might be significantly different
> from before.
OK, yea, just leave the bit. We can add documentation that they should
run CLUSTER again if they radically modified the column as part of the
ALTER>
-- Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us pgman@candle.pha.pa.us | (610)
359-1001+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road + Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square,
Pennsylvania19073
