Re: Multiple Xids in PGPROC? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Bruce Momjian
Subject Re: Multiple Xids in PGPROC?
Date
Msg-id 200405060249.i462nj810260@candle.pha.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Multiple Xids in PGPROC?  (Manfred Koizar <mkoi-pg@aon.at>)
List pgsql-hackers
Manfred Koizar wrote:
> With subtransactions we'd have to fall back to checking pg_clog (and
> pg_subtrans) in certain cases.  There are lots of possible
> implementations.  Here are some ideas (just brainstorming):
> 
>  .  We could first scan the PGPROC array.  If the xid is an active main
> transaction, we're finished.
> 
>  .  If xid is older than RecentGlobalXmin, it cannot be active.
> 
>  .  We could include a small number of subtransaction xids in PGPROC.
> 
>  .  For additional subtransactions not fitting into this small array
> there could be minsubxid and maxsubxid fields in PGPROC.  If the xid we
> are looking for is outside all these ranges, it cannot be an active
> subtransaction.
> 
>  .  If all these tests fail, we fall back to checking pg_clog.

Could we add a boolean to each PROC structure indicating if that xid has
subtransactions?  If none have subtransactions, we don't need to look in
pg_clog.

--  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://candle.pha.pa.us pgman@candle.pha.pa.us               |  (610)
359-1001+  If your life is a hard drive,     |  13 Roberts Road +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Newtown Square,
Pennsylvania19073
 


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: Multiple Xids in PGPROC?
Next
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: ALTER TABLE TODO items