Re: Weird prepared stmt behavior - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Alvaro Herrera
Subject Re: Weird prepared stmt behavior
Date
Msg-id 20040504131219.GB2417@dcc.uchile.cl
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Weird prepared stmt behavior  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Tue, May 04, 2004 at 12:03:16AM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@dcc.uchile.cl> writes:
> > Right.  But note that Tom wants to distinguish between statements
> > created via PREPARE (which would rollback) from those created via a
> > Prepare message (which wouldn't).
> 
> Actually, no, I'd prefer not to make such a distinction; I'd be happy
> with SQL-level PREPARE being nontransactional.  I'd be willing to put up
> with that distinction if someone shows it's needed, but so far there's
> not been a really good argument advanced for it, has there?

Will do.

-- 
Alvaro Herrera (<alvherre[a]dcc.uchile.cl>)
"I would rather have GNU than GNOT."  (ccchips, lwn.net/Articles/37595/)


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: inconsistent owners in newly created databases?
Next
From: Alvaro Herrera
Date:
Subject: Re: Call for 7.5 feature completion