Re: contrib vs. gborg/pgfoundry for replication solutions - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Marc G. Fournier
Subject Re: contrib vs. gborg/pgfoundry for replication solutions
Date
Msg-id 20040421234728.V32445@ganymede.hub.org
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: contrib vs. gborg/pgfoundry for replication solutions  (Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>)
Responses Re: contrib vs. gborg/pgfoundry for replication solutions
List pgsql-hackers
On Wed, 21 Apr 2004, Bruce Momjian wrote:

> There are only a few PostgreSQL developers who can do it, so what are
> the odds that a single guy who maintains a plugin is going to be able to
> do it.  And you can say it is easy, but it just takes one complex
> problem to hit you, and with PostgreSQL, and all the shared lib stuff
> and dynamic loading, lots of it is complex.

So, put together a developers kit ... you'd need, what, a half dozen files
to bootstrap a project with?  configure.in, Makefile.in, a README file
with the basics on what needs to be modified in Makefile.in, the
src/template directory ...

If you are looking for a problem to solve, make it easier for developers
to setup a proper build environment, don't punish end-users to giving them
a bigger package to download


----
Marc G. Fournier           Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org)
Email: scrappy@hub.org           Yahoo!: yscrappy              ICQ: 7615664


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Jan Wieck
Date:
Subject: Re: contrib vs. gborg/pgfoundry for replication solutions
Next
From: Joe Conway
Date:
Subject: Re: contrib vs. gborg/pgfoundry for replication solutions