Re: MySQL vs PG TPC-H benchmarks - Mailing list pgsql-performance

From Paul Thomas
Subject Re: MySQL vs PG TPC-H benchmarks
Date
Msg-id 20040421150809.C23015@bacon
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: MySQL vs PG TPC-H benchmarks  ("Cestmir Hybl" <cestmirl@freeside.sk>)
List pgsql-performance
On 21/04/2004 14:31 Cestmir Hybl wrote:
> > Looks like he's using the default postgresql.conf settings in which
> case
> > I'm not suprised at pg looking so slow.
>
> The question also is, IMHO, why the hell, postgreSQL still comes out of
> the
> box with so stupid configuration defaults, totally underestimated for
> todays
> average hardware configuration (1+GHz, 0.5+GB RAM, fast FSB, fast HDD).
>
> It seems to me better strategy to force that 1% of users to "downgrade"
> cfg.
> than vice-versa.
>
> regards
> ch
>

This has been discussed many times before. Check the archives.

--
Paul Thomas
+------------------------------+---------------------------------------------+
| Thomas Micro Systems Limited | Software Solutions for
Business             |
| Computer Consultants         |
http://www.thomas-micro-systems-ltd.co.uk   |
+------------------------------+---------------------------------------------+

pgsql-performance by date:

Previous
From: "Cestmir Hybl"
Date:
Subject: Re: MySQL vs PG TPC-H benchmarks
Next
From: Stephan Szabo
Date:
Subject: Re: slow seqscan