Re: PG vs MySQL - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Mike Nolan
Subject Re: PG vs MySQL
Date
Msg-id 200403292132.i2TLWUMX017652@gw.tssi.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: PG vs MySQL  ("scott.marlowe" <scott.marlowe@ihs.com>)
List pgsql-general
> since the purpose of the pg_hba.conf file is to ensure that you never
> manage to lock yourself out of your database, might it make sense to have
> a pg_hba table in each database that can be / will be / should be(???)
> overidden by the pg_hba.conf file, thus ensuring you never get locked out,
> but allowing the vast majority of connection configuration to be handled
> by tables, with the pg_hba.conf as an emergency procedure used to get the
> warp engines online in case some drunken ensign starts singing "I'll take
> you home Kathleen" and shuts them down. (i.e. "delete from pg_hba" or
> something like it.)???

How about some kind of 'include table pg_hba' statement in the
pg_hba.conf file?

Anything prior to that could not be overridden by entries in the pg_hba
table, and the absence of an include statement means that only the file
entries are used, preserving the current behavior.
--
Mike Nolan



pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: "scott.marlowe"
Date:
Subject: Re: PG vs MySQL
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: PG vs MySQL