Re: special integrity constraints - Mailing list pgsql-sql

From Bruno Wolff III
Subject Re: special integrity constraints
Date
Msg-id 20040322151211.GA2962@wolff.to
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: special integrity constraints  (Erik Thiele <erik@thiele-hydraulik.de>)
Responses Re: special integrity constraints  (Erik Thiele <erik@thiele-hydraulik.de>)
List pgsql-sql
On Mon, Mar 22, 2004 at 14:10:42 +0100, Erik Thiele <erik@thiele-hydraulik.de> wrote:
> 
> it means (((count_rows(a)+count_rows(b)) modulo 2) == 0)

OK, that means my FK suggestion won't help. The other suggestion about
putting triggers on "a" and "b" to update a count in another table
that has a deferred check constraint on it may be your best bet.
This will be a source of contention, but that may or may not be all
that important depending on how often you are updating "a" and "b".


pgsql-sql by date:

Previous
From: Stephan Szabo
Date:
Subject: Re: special integrity constraints
Next
From: Bruno Wolff III
Date:
Subject: Re: inverse of "day of year"