Re: [PATCHES] NO WAIT ... - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tatsuo Ishii
Subject Re: [PATCHES] NO WAIT ...
Date
Msg-id 20040309.144707.59653448.t-ishii@sra.co.jp
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [PATCHES] NO WAIT ...  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: [PATCHES] NO WAIT ...  (Christopher Kings-Lynne <chriskl@familyhealth.com.au>)
Re: [PATCHES] NO WAIT ...  (Hans-Jürgen Schönig <postgres@cybertec.at>)
List pgsql-hackers
If "NOWAIT" is the choice, I could live with it. If there's no
objection, I will go with "NOWAIT", not "NO WAIT".
--
Tatsuo Ishii

> Tatsuo Ishii <t-ishii@sra.co.jp> writes:
> > LOCK TABLE table NO WAIT is OK for 7.5? If ok, I will make patches
> > against current with some docs changes.
> 
> Dept of minor gripes: can we do this without turning "NO" into a
> keyword?  Even as a nonreserved word, I think that would be annoying.
> "no" is a common abbreviation for "number" so I think it's likely to
> get used as a column name.
> 
> If Oracle spells it "NOWAIT" then I'd be much happier with that...
> 
>             regards, tom lane
> 


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: [PATCHES] NO WAIT ...
Next
From: Christopher Kings-Lynne
Date:
Subject: Re: [PATCHES] NO WAIT ...