Re: Pl/Java - next step? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Peter Eisentraut
Subject Re: Pl/Java - next step?
Date
Msg-id 200402231714.09095.peter_e@gmx.net
Whole thread Raw
In response to Pl/Java - next step?  ("Thomas Hallgren" <thhal@mailblocks.com>)
Responses Re: Pl/Java - next step?  (Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@dcc.uchile.cl>)
List pgsql-hackers
Thomas Hallgren wrote:
> 1. Select Pl/Java_JNI.
> 2. Select Pl/Java_remote
> 3. Choose both and agree on the SQL + Java semantics
> 4. Make the postmaster spawn threads rather than processes
> (controversial? Nah :-) )

Option 5 (or 0) would be to use GCJ.  This is likely to be the fastest 
and most lightweight solution, but perhaps not the most featureful.



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Shridhar Daithankar
Date:
Subject: Thread safe connection-name mapping in ECPG. Is it required?
Next
From: "Thomas Hallgren"
Date:
Subject: Re: Pl/Java - next step?