Re: cacheable stored functions? - Mailing list pgsql-performance

From Richard Huxton
Subject Re: cacheable stored functions?
Date
Msg-id 200402201601.28789.dev@archonet.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to cacheable stored functions?  (Bill Moran <wmoran@potentialtech.com>)
Responses Re: cacheable stored functions?
List pgsql-performance
On Friday 20 February 2004 15:35, Bill Moran wrote:
> I'm converting a SQL application to PostgreSQL.  The majority of the logic
> in this application is in the stored functions in the database.
>
> Somewhere, I saw a reference to "WITH (iscachable)" for stored functions,
> looking again, I'm unable to find any reference to this directive.  I have
> a single function that is _obviously_ safe to cache using this, and it
> generates no errors or problems that I can see.
>
> Now I'm looking at a lot of other functions that, if cached, would speed
> up performance considerably.  Yet I'm reluctant to use this directive
> since I can't find documentation on it anywhere.

From memory, "iscachable" was replaced in version 7.3 by the three
finer-grained settings IMMUTABLE, STABLE, VOLATILE.

I'm guessing the old behaviour is still there for backwards compatibility, but
it's probably best to use the new versions.

--
  Richard Huxton
  Archonet Ltd

pgsql-performance by date:

Previous
From: Tomasz Myrta
Date:
Subject: Re: cacheable stored functions?
Next
From: Bill Moran
Date:
Subject: Re: cacheable stored functions?