Re: Quad Xeon vs. Dual Itanium - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Andrew Sullivan
Subject Re: Quad Xeon vs. Dual Itanium
Date
Msg-id 20040214050131.GA3594@phlogiston.dyndns.org
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Quad Xeon vs. Dual Itanium  ("Dann Corbit" <DCorbit@connx.com>)
List pgsql-general
On Fri, Feb 13, 2004 at 06:11:08PM -0800, Dann Corbit wrote:
>
> Size of the database is huge (e.g. every toll paid in New Jersey in the
> last 5 years)
> Available memory is huge (e.g. you buy a machine with 24 gigs of ram)
> Data bus bandwidth is huge (e.g. You buy an 8-way Opteron with 40 GB/sec
> bandwidth)
>
> The 32 bit machines cannot compete in these arenas.

I'm not supporting immense databases with this, but I am using 8- and
10- way UltraSPARC II boxes with 16 G of ram.  I've been unable to
show a difference.  There might _be_ one, mind, I just haven't shown
it.

A

--
Andrew Sullivan  | ajs@crankycanuck.ca
I remember when computers were frustrating because they *did* exactly what
you told them to.  That actually seems sort of quaint now.
        --J.D. Baldwin

pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Mark Kirkwood
Date:
Subject: Re: Quad Xeon vs. Dual Itanium
Next
From: Andrew Sullivan
Date:
Subject: Re: Quad Xeon vs. Dual Itanium