Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> > > Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > > > I assume the group agreed that adding XML to libpq was the way to
> > > > handle XML, with a hook in psql to call it.
> > >
> > > I'm not sure about that, but we certainly disagree with this kind
> > > of nonstandard XML when there is a perfectly good standard out
> > > there.
> >
> > OK, can you elaborate? What is the non-standard part? His choice of
> > tags?
>
> Yes. The SQL/XML standard has been discussed several times on this
> list. Additionally, it has been mentioned that an implementation in
> libpq is too specific for some. Some people want streaming interfaces,
> some want it in the backend, etc. I think there are going to be many
> implementations of the XML theme, so I think it's premature to adopt
> one of them into libpq.
OK, what do you suggest the poster does now? Use SQL/XML? Move it into
the backend?
--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman@candle.pha.pa.us | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073
