Dennis Bjorklund wrote:
> Thinking more about it, I'm not sure if it really is an important
> addition at all. I've got a number of requests for the feature. so
> there are people that want it, that much I know.
I like it very much, and I think mostly everyone else does, too. It's
just a question of what syntax to use. Personally, I would be OK with
"=>". The SQL standard already attaches a special meaning to "->"
(object dereference, like in C), so I'd just avoid all "arrows" as
operator names.
