Re: High Performance/High Reliability File system on SuSE64 - Mailing list pgsql-performance

From George Essig
Subject Re: High Performance/High Reliability File system on SuSE64
Date
Msg-id 20040127175236.5176.qmail@web80203.mail.yahoo.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to High Performance/High Reliability File system on SuSE64  ("Dave Thompson" <dave@hub.org>)
List pgsql-performance
> Hello All
>
> Just wanted to gather opinions on what file system has the best balance between performance and
> reliability when used on a quad processor machine running SuSE64.  Thanks
>
> DAve

I was reading the article 'Behind the ALTIX 3000' in the Feb. 2003 Linux Journal, and it mentioned
the following paper which compares Ext2, Ext3, ReiserFS, XFS, and JFS:

Filesystem Performance and Scalability in Linux 2.4.17
Originally published in Proceedings of the FREENIX Track:
2002 USENIX Annual Technical Conference
http://oss.sgi.com/projects/xfs/papers/filesystem-perf-tm.pdf

Quoting the abtract:

Although the best-performing filesystem varies depending on the benchmark and system used, some
larger trends are evident in the data. On the smaller systems, the best-performing file system is
often Ext2, Ext3 or ReiserFS. For the larger systems and higher loads, XFS can provide the best
overall performance.

George Essig

pgsql-performance by date:

Previous
From: Alan Stange
Date:
Subject: Re: Insert Times
Next
From: "Joshua D. Drake"
Date:
Subject: pl/pgSQL versus pl/Python