Re: What's planned for 7.5? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Andrew Sullivan
Subject Re: What's planned for 7.5?
Date
Msg-id 20040119190746.GD4457@phlogiston.dyndns.org
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: What's planned for 7.5?  (Jan Wieck <JanWieck@Yahoo.com>)
Responses Re: What's planned for 7.5?  (David Garamond <lists@zara.6.isreserved.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Mon, Jan 19, 2004 at 08:12:28AM -0500, Jan Wieck wrote:
> and cons, none is the "one size that fits all" magic solution. To select 

Does anyone realy believe that there can be a one size fits all
solution?  Heck, even Oracle and IBM offer a couple of different
systems, depending on what you need.  (That also suggests that any
replication system need not always be shipped with the "basic"
distribution, but could instead be integrated into a larger,
postgresql_plus_enterprise_features.tgz or something like that.)

A

-- 
Andrew Sullivan  | ajs@crankycanuck.ca
I remember when computers were frustrating because they *did* exactly what 
you told them to.  That actually seems sort of quaint now.    --J.D. Baldwin


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: ohp@pyrenet.fr
Date:
Subject: Re: Strange COPY from problem (resent)
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: set search_path and pg_dumpall