Re: What's planned for 7.5? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From David Garamond
Subject Re: What's planned for 7.5?
Date
Msg-id 400CC8AF.6070305@zara.6.isreserved.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: What's planned for 7.5?  (Andrew Sullivan <ajs@crankycanuck.ca>)
List pgsql-hackers
Andrew Sullivan wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 19, 2004 at 08:12:28AM -0500, Jan Wieck wrote:
> 
>>and cons, none is the "one size that fits all" magic solution. To select 
> 
> Does anyone realy believe that there can be a one size fits all
> solution?  Heck, even Oracle and IBM offer a couple of different
> systems, depending on what you need.  (That also suggests that any
> replication system need not always be shipped with the "basic"
> distribution, but could instead be integrated into a larger,
> postgresql_plus_enterprise_features.tgz or something like that.)

I don't, but consider Linux which can be configured to run on devices as 
small as a wristwatch and as large as the the big irons...

-- 
dave


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: "Matthew T. O'Connor"
Date:
Subject: Re: VACUUM delay (was Re: What's planned for 7.5?)
Next
From: Christopher Kings-Lynne
Date:
Subject: [Fwd: plpgsql and booleans?]