Mailing lists [pgsql-hackers]

19 January 2004

• 02:21   Re: User Defined Functions/AM's inherently slow? Eric B.Ridge
• 02:59   Re: User Defined Functions/AM's inherently slow? Tom Lane
• 06:53   [patch] jdbc build fix when ./configure is run in separate dir tim@keow.org
• 13:14   Re: What's planned for 7.5? Jan Wieck
• 13:14   Getting the results columns before execution Shachar Shemesh
• 13:39   Re: VACUUM delay (was Re: What's planned for 7.5?) Jan Wieck
• 13:49   Re: Getting the results columns before execution Darko Prenosil
• 14:13   Re: Getting the results columns before execution Tom Lane
• 15:10   Re: Getting the results columns before execution Shachar Shemesh
• 15:18   logging enhancement recap Andrew Dunstan
• 15:28   Re: Getting the results columns before execution Tom Lane
• 16:58   Re: Incremental Backup (Was: And ppl complain about *our* Jan Wieck
• 17:29   Re: Strange COPY from problem (resent) Robert Treat
• 17:41   Re: Strange COPY from problem (resent) ohp@pyrenet.fr
• 18:08   Re: What's planned for 7.5? Andrew Sullivan
• 18:12   Re: set search_path and pg_dumpall Tom Lane
• 18:36   Old binary packages. Lamar Owen
• 18:50   [7.4] "permissions problem" with pl/pgsql function Marc G. Fournier
• 19:01   Re: Old binary packages. Joshua D. Drake
• 19:30   Re: [7.4] "permissions problem" with pl/pgsql function Tom Lane
• 19:54   Re: Old binary packages. Tom Lane
• 21:38   SPI_prepare and error recovery Thomas Hallgren
• 22:15   Re: SPI_prepare and error recovery Tom Lane
• 23:20   Re: Old binary packages. Peter Eisentraut
• 23:21   Re: [7.4] "permissions problem" with pl/pgsql function Christopher Kings-Lynne
• 23:38   Re: SPI_prepare and error recovery Thomas Hallgren
• 23:38   Re: VACUUM delay (was Re: What's planned for 7.5?) Josh Berkus