On Tuesday 13 January 2004 17:46, Chris Ochs wrote:
> Yes it was in my function. I thought the docs said that BEGIN and END had
> no effect on transactions though? Plus wouldn't there have to be a
> transaction active since I was not using autocommit and the inserts did in
> fact commit?
>
> I suspect it is the end statement doing this though, I'll take it out and
> see what happens.
I think you're right - I looked back at your earlier posts and you are mixing
up plpgsql and sql function syntax (easy enough to do).
BEGIN...END bracket the body of a plpgsql function, but control a transaction
in the SQL function. The BEGIN would have been ignored, the END would have
committed the current transaction.
--
Richard Huxton
Archonet Ltd
