Tom,
> In general I am suspicious of proposals to rewrite queries into UNION
> "equivalents", because the "equivalent" usually isn't exactly
> equivalent, at least not without conditions that the planner can't
> easily prove.
As I said, I'm not sure that UNIONing the query is the solution, we just need
something other than what the planner currently does, which does not
complete.
Explains later today.
--
Josh Berkus
Aglio Database Solutions
San Francisco
