Merlin Moncure wrote:
> Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > Here is the SRA sync() code for Win32. As you might know, fsync on
> > Win32 is _commit, and sync() is _flushall. However, _flushall only
> > flushes only _open_ kernel buffers, not dirty buffers that have been
> > closed. Therefore, on Win32, during checkpoint, you have to open,
> > fsync(_commit), close all file that have been modified since the
> > previous checkpoint.
>
> That is not quite correct. flushall() flushes all open file streams,
> not open file 'handles' i.e. array references to _osfile[] returned by
> _open(). flushall() is an aggregate fflush() command(). Note that this
> is as implemented by Microsoft C runtime, not necessarily MinGW. So,
> when compiled with the ms C libraries, _flushall is useless.
>
> A _handle based flushall routine would have to loop over the _osfile
> array and commit file handles, or track them externally as SRA did.
>
> What about rewriting the close routine to call FlushFileBuffers before
> closing the file? Would this break anything?
>
> > Not sure how we are going to do this in Win32, but somehow we will
> have
> > to record all open files between checkpoints in an area that the
> > checkpoint process can read during a checkpoint.
>
> Iff the file handles can be reliably commited on closure this would not
> be necessary. The C runtime already keeps track of open files.
The problem is that fsync on commit of all open files would cause poor
performance.
--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman@candle.pha.pa.us | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073
