On Saturday 22 November 2003 18:53, Marc G. Fournier wrote:
> On Sat, 22 Nov 2003, Robert Treat wrote:
> > On Saturday 22 November 2003 14:17, Marc G. Fournier wrote:
> > > On Sat, 22 Nov 2003, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> > > > Marc G. Fournier writes:
> > > > > What's I'd like to see is more projects listed on gborg, even if it
> > > > > provides a link to the main project site like with the ODBC driver,
> > > > > but it provides a list of 'postgresql related software' ... kinda
> > > > > like a freshmeat for PostgreSQL ...
> > > >
> > > > I think it might be more suitable and less confusing if there was in
> > > > fact a freshmeat (in addition to a sourceforge) for PostgreSQL.
> > >
> > > k, what does it take to set one up?
> > >
> > > re: sourceforge ... are you suggesting replacing gborg with sourceforge
> > > code though? is gborg itself *that* broken that it can't be extended
> > > to do what we want?
> >
> > I don't know that it's broken, but switching to gforge would certainly
> > give us more advanced software that would also be maintained by people
> > completly outside our community. Given our tight resources, this is
> > certainly a bonus.
>
> 'k, do you have anyone in mind who is willing to set up, and admin, it?
> I don't imagine its the sort of thing that runs itself, is it? can it run
> within the same VM as www.postgresql.org, or are there security reasons
> why it shouldn't?
>
Well that is always the question isnt it? I'd be willing to try to install
it, I'm not sure of it's compatibility with bsd, but we might be able to get
Tim Purdue to help us out. The problem is I'm pretty loaded up now, so it
seems tough to believe I would have time to maintain it...course maybe it
doesn't need a lot of maintainance... I'm guessing it needs to live on its
own vm for all the reasons gborg needs to be on its own.
Robert Treat
--
Build A Brighter Lamp :: Linux Apache {middleware} PostgreSQL
