Re: Temp rows - is it possible? - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Robert Creager
Subject Re: Temp rows - is it possible?
Date
Msg-id 20031110134630.33a79ef1.Robert_Creager@LogicalChaos.org
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Temp rows - is it possible?  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: Temp rows - is it possible?  (Shridhar Daithankar <shridhar_daithankar@myrealbox.com>)
List pgsql-general
When grilled further on (Mon, 10 Nov 2003 09:39:32 -0500),
Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> confessed:

>
> We recently decided we had to forbid foreign-key references from temp
> tables to permanent tables because of this effect.  I wonder whether
> we won't end up forbidding temp tables as children of permanent tables
> too.
>

Forbidding temp tables that inherit?  That would suck (as someone who uses
them).  Would there be an alternate method to easily create a temp table that is
identical to another?

Cheers,
Rob

--
 13:44:43 up 101 days,  7:03,  5 users,  load average: 3.37, 2.99, 2.55

Attachment

pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: Temp rows - is it possible?
Next
From: Christopher Browne
Date:
Subject: Re: [off-topic] Bugtracker using PostgreSQL