Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Changes to Contributor List - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Bruce Momjian
Subject Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Changes to Contributor List
Date
Msg-id 200311071412.hA7ECon25718@candle.pha.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Changes to Contributor List  (Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>)
Responses Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Changes to Contributor List
List pgsql-hackers
Imagine this discussion with your boss:

    You:  I want to spend an hour a day at work on PostgreSQL
          community work.
    Boss: Hmm.  (How do I justify this?)
    You:  Our company will be listed on the main PostgreSQL web
          site.
    Boss: Fine.  (That gives me a legitimate business purpose.)

This is why listing companies/individuals is good for several reasons,
and this is one of them.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> Josh Berkus writes:
>
> > But it does!   You pointed it out yourself .... for the hackers & OSS tech
> > people, they can just look at the descriptions of the major contributors and
> > figure things out for themselves.   They don't need a list with company logos
> > & links.
>
> Other people have pointed out that this is not really sufficient.  So if
> there is to be a separate company list, then it should be next to the
> individuals list.
>
> > This is important because we've (people on the Advocacy list) briefly
> > discussed expanding this page to cover companies which, in the future, make
> > *financial* contributions to PostgreSQL ... sort of a "corporate donors"
> > page.   This works very well in standard nonprofit fundraising; the project
> > gets $, and the donors get publicity.  Obviously, contributors would have to
> > be categorized, but that's an issue for when we're ready to set it up.
>
> When we're ready.  But we're not.
>
> But then again, this sort of list would mostly be of use to existing
> users, in the sense, "They support a project I like, so I like them."
> You could only really make use of that for attracting potential users if
> you could make a clear case the the amount of donations is sufficient to
> guarantee any kind of longevity of the project.  I think that will be hard
> to do (because there is, in fact, absolutely no relation).  But hopefully,
> by the time we've arrived there, this silly web site fragmentation will be
> over and this question will be moot.
>
> --
> Peter Eisentraut   peter_e@gmx.net
>
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 1: subscribe and unsubscribe commands go to majordomo@postgresql.org
>

--
  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://candle.pha.pa.us
  pgman@candle.pha.pa.us               |  (610) 359-1001
  +  If your life is a hard drive,     |  13 Roberts Road
  +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: Information Schema and constraint names not unique
Next
From: Christopher Browne
Date:
Subject: Re: Performance features the 4th