On Tue, 28 Oct 2003 10:32:36 -0800 (PST)
Stephan Szabo <sszabo@megazone.bigpanda.com> wrote:
> Hmm, 298383 -> 83109 (since those are the 256k numbers). Not as
> much as I'd have hoped, but I'll take a factor of 3.
Yes. those are the numbers for 256MB of sort_mem.
It seemed to saturate the IO so once I get more disks in here it should
hopefully speed up.
--
Jeff Trout <jeff@jefftrout.com>
http://www.jefftrout.com/http://www.stuarthamm.net/
