Re: Tuning for mid-size server - Mailing list pgsql-performance

From Josh Berkus
Subject Re: Tuning for mid-size server
Date
Msg-id 200310211022.49356.josh@agliodbs.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Tuning for mid-size server  ("Anjan Dave" <adave@vantage.com>)
Responses Re: Tuning for mid-size server  ("scott.marlowe" <scott.marlowe@ihs.com>)
List pgsql-performance
Anjan,

> From what I know, there is a cache-row-set functionality that doesn't
> exist with the newer postgres...

What?  PostgreSQL has always used the kernel cache for queries.

> Concurrent users will start from 1 to a high of 5000 or more, and could
> ramp up rapidly. So far, with increased users, we have gone up to
> starting the JVM (resin startup) with 1024megs min and max (recommended
> by Sun) - on the app side.

Well, just keep in mind when tuning that your calculations should be based on
*available* RAM, meaning RAM not used by Apache or the JVM.

With that many concurrent requests, you'll want to be *very* conservative with
sort_mem; I might stick to the default of 1024 if I were you, or even lower
it to 512k.

--
Josh Berkus
Aglio Database Solutions
San Francisco

pgsql-performance by date:

Previous
From: Josh Berkus
Date:
Subject: Re: Tuning for mid-size server
Next
From: "scott.marlowe"
Date:
Subject: Re: Tuning for mid-size server