Tom Lane wrote:
> Christopher Kings-Lynne <chriskl@familyhealth.com.au> writes:
> > What about bumping the libpq version?
>
> After thinking more, I realized we only need a minor version bump not
> major (AFAIR there were no backwards-incompatible API changes this time,
> only additions). That's already been done; so my gripe of yesterday
> was incorrect. Never mind ...
Or, should I say, "Glad we are OK with current libpq version numbers".
-- Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us pgman@candle.pha.pa.us | (610)
359-1001+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road + Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square,
Pennsylvania19073
