Re: Looks like we'll have a beta5 ... - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: Looks like we'll have a beta5 ...
Date
Msg-id 17109.1066697034@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Looks like we'll have a beta5 ...  (Christopher Kings-Lynne <chriskl@familyhealth.com.au>)
Responses Re: Looks like we'll have a beta5 ...
Re: Looks like we'll have a beta5 ...
List pgsql-hackers
Christopher Kings-Lynne <chriskl@familyhealth.com.au> writes:
> What about bumping the libpq version?

After thinking more, I realized we only need a minor version bump not
major (AFAIR there were no backwards-incompatible API changes this time,
only additions).  That's already been done; so my gripe of yesterday
was incorrect.  Never mind ...
        regards, tom lane


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Christopher Kings-Lynne
Date:
Subject: Re: Looks like we'll have a beta5 ...
Next
From: Christopher Kings-Lynne
Date:
Subject: multi-backend psql