Re: Looks like we'll have a beta5 ... - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Bruce Momjian
Subject Re: Looks like we'll have a beta5 ...
Date
Msg-id 200310210313.h9L3DJt10020@candle.pha.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Looks like we'll have a beta5 ...  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
Tom Lane wrote:
> Christopher Kings-Lynne <chriskl@familyhealth.com.au> writes:
> > What about bumping the libpq version?
> 
> After thinking more, I realized we only need a minor version bump not
> major (AFAIR there were no backwards-incompatible API changes this time,
> only additions).  That's already been done; so my gripe of yesterday
> was incorrect.  Never mind ...

Got it.

--  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://candle.pha.pa.us pgman@candle.pha.pa.us               |  (610)
359-1001+  If your life is a hard drive,     |  13 Roberts Road +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Newtown Square,
Pennsylvania19073
 


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Christopher Kings-Lynne
Date:
Subject: Re: multi-backend psql
Next
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: Looks like we'll have a beta5 ...