Re: Cygwin? or paid version from SRA? - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Bruce Momjian
Subject Re: Cygwin? or paid version from SRA?
Date
Msg-id 200310151314.h9FDE9T10634@candle.pha.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Cygwin? or paid version from SRA?  ("David So" <davidso@netband.com.hk>)
Responses Re: Cygwin? or paid version from SRA?  (Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@dcc.uchile.cl>)
List pgsql-general
David So wrote:
> Hi All
>
>
>
> For deploying PostgreSQL on Windoz platform, which one is a better
> option (performance, reliability) ? Thru Cygwin or Paid version from
> SRA?

I think SRA's version has better performance because it is a native
Windows version, rather than using Cygwin, and it does threading, rather
than CreateProcess() to start each database session.

Of course, I work for SRA.

--
  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://candle.pha.pa.us
  pgman@candle.pha.pa.us               |  (610) 359-1001
  +  If your life is a hard drive,     |  13 Roberts Road
  +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073

pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Andreas Fromm
Date:
Subject: Re: PG tools
Next
From: Richard Huxton
Date:
Subject: Re: Cygwin? or paid version from SRA?