Re: int1? types? - Mailing list pgsql-general

From elein
Subject Re: int1? types?
Date
Msg-id 20031010182307.E6483@cookie.varlena.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: int1? types?  (Joe Conway <mail@joeconway.com>)
Responses Re: int1? types?  (Joe Conway <mail@joeconway.com>)
List pgsql-general
The "char" type has special handling built into the server
if I recall correctly and that is part of the reason it
does not behave correctly in some cases.  But I think it is
still schlepped around as a DATUM which is a four byte value.

What I meant was a user defined single byte data type.
I don't think it can be done since it needs to be packaged
as a DATUM.

elein

On Fri, Oct 10, 2003 at 06:07:00PM -0700, Joe Conway wrote:
> elein wrote:
> >I don't think that you can create a genuine one byte datatype.
> >The resulting type would probably be four bytes long, even if
> >you create a one byte by-value data type.  The one byte would
> >be packaged in a 4 byte container for passing around the server.
> >
> >Can anyone confirm or deny this?
>
> See my other post. The type exists and is called "char". See the bottom
> of this page:
> http://www.postgresql.org/docs/view.php?version=7.3&idoc=0&file=datatype-character.html
>
> Joe
>
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 2: you can get off all lists at once with the unregister command
>    (send "unregister YourEmailAddressHere" to majordomo@postgresql.org)

pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Joe Conway
Date:
Subject: Re: int1? types?
Next
From: Joe Conway
Date:
Subject: Re: int1? types?