Re: CREATE USER bug - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Bruce Momjian
Subject Re: CREATE USER bug
Date
Msg-id 200310101730.h9AHUtP25458@candle.pha.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: CREATE USER bug  (Neil Conway <neilc@samurai.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
Neil Conway wrote:
> On Mon, 2003-10-06 at 16:21, Joshua D. Drake wrote:
> > postgres=# create user with encrypted password '98wq7912a';
> > CREATE USER
> > postgres=# create user with encrypted password '98wq7912a';
> > ERROR:  CREATE USER: user name "with" already exists
> 
> So, what are we doing about this? If we're considering it a bug, one way
> to fix it is to move WITH from unreserved_keywords to reserved_keywords.
> Any other suggestions?

I think the code is fine as it is now, seeing how WITH is optional:
      CREATE USER username [ [ WITH ] option [ ... ] ]

I don't see a huge problem with allowing "with" as a user name.  Of
course, we could require them to write:
      CREATE USER with WITH ...

but then WITH isn't optional anymore, at least for a user named 'with'.

--  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://candle.pha.pa.us pgman@candle.pha.pa.us               |  (610)
359-1001+  If your life is a hard drive,     |  13 Roberts Road +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Newtown Square,
Pennsylvania19073
 


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Robert Treat
Date:
Subject: last beta version to require initdb
Next
From: Peter Eisentraut
Date:
Subject: Re: last beta version to require initdb