Re: reindex/vacuum locking/performance? - Mailing list pgsql-performance

From Andrew Sullivan
Subject Re: reindex/vacuum locking/performance?
Date
Msg-id 20031005143431.GC3441@libertyrms.info
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: reindex/vacuum locking/performance?  ("Matt Clark" <matt@ymogen.net>)
Responses Re: reindex/vacuum locking/performance?  ("Matt Clark" <matt@ymogen.net>)
List pgsql-performance
On Sun, Oct 05, 2003 at 12:14:24PM +0100, Matt Clark wrote:
> more info on how it clobbers shared_buffers?

Vacuum is like a seqscan.  It touches everything on a table.  So it
doesn't clobber them, but that's the latest data.  It's unlikely your
buffers are big enough to hold your database, unless your database is
small.  So you'll end up expiring potentially useful data in the
buffer.

A

--
----
Andrew Sullivan                         204-4141 Yonge Street
Afilias Canada                        Toronto, Ontario Canada
<andrew@libertyrms.info>                              M2P 2A8
                                         +1 416 646 3304 x110


pgsql-performance by date:

Previous
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: COUNT(*) again (was Re: [HACKERS] Index/Function organized
Next
From: "Matt Clark"
Date:
Subject: Re: reindex/vacuum locking/performance?