Re: reindex/vacuum locking/performance? - Mailing list pgsql-performance

From Andrew Sullivan
Subject Re: reindex/vacuum locking/performance?
Date
Msg-id 20031004152241.GL580@libertyrms.info
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: reindex/vacuum locking/performance?  ("Matt Clark" <matt@ymogen.net>)
Responses Re: reindex/vacuum locking/performance?
Re: reindex/vacuum locking/performance?
List pgsql-performance
On Sat, Oct 04, 2003 at 12:29:55AM +0100, Matt Clark wrote:
> My real world experience on a *very* heavily updated OLTP type DB, following
> advice from this list (thanks guys!), is that there is essentially zero cost
> to going ahead and vacuuming as often as you feel like it.  Go crazy, and
> speed up your DB!

That's not quite true.  If vacuums start running into each other, you
can very easily start eating up all your I/O bandwidth.  Even if you
gots lots of it.

Also, a vacuum pretty much destroys your shared buffers, so you have
to be aware of that trade-off too.  Vacuum is not free.  It's _way_
cheaper than it used to be, though.

A

--
----
Andrew Sullivan                         204-4141 Yonge Street
Afilias Canada                        Toronto, Ontario Canada
<andrew@libertyrms.info>                              M2P 2A8
                                         +1 416 646 3304 x110


pgsql-performance by date:

Previous
From: Andrew Sullivan
Date:
Subject: Re: reindex/vacuum locking/performance?
Next
From: Andrew Sullivan
Date:
Subject: Re: reindex/vacuum locking/performance?