Where did we leave this?
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Ron Mayer wrote:
>
> Tom wrote:
> > Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net> writes:
> > > Tom Lane writes:
> > >> Yes, but by the same token "iso8601" isn't specific enough either.
>
> ISO 8601 gives more specific names.
>
> ISO 8601 Basic Format: P2Y10M15DT10H20M30S
> ISO 8601 Alternative Format: P00021015T102030
> ISO 8601 Extended Format: P0002-10-15T10:20:30
>
> In a way, the Extended Format is kinda nice, since it?s
> almost human readable.
>
> I could put in both the basic and extended ones, and
> call the dateformats ?iso8601basic? and ?iso8601extended?.
> The negative is that to do ?iso8601basic? right, I?d also
> have to tweak the ?date? and ?time? parts of the code too.
>
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 4: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster
>
--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman@candle.pha.pa.us | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073
