Re: Fw: Case Insensitive Test - Mailing list pgsql-admin

From Stephan Szabo
Subject Re: Fw: Case Insensitive Test
Date
Msg-id 20030926074907.C4723@megazone.bigpanda.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Fw: Case Insensitive Test  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: Fw: Case Insensitive Test  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-admin
On Fri, 26 Sep 2003, Tom Lane wrote:

> Stephan Szabo <sszabo@megazone.bigpanda.com> writes:
> >> I've been through them.  None of 'em turn off // comments.  Or #-sign
>
> > On at least some versions of gcc it looks like --std=c89 turns them off
>
> Hmm, I haven't tried that in particular.  I wonder what else it does?

It looks from the headers, that by default that'll not define a bunch of
extensions stuff.  It's apparently enough stuff that even if I get around
the immediate problem I had I get a complaint about SIG_SETMASK being
undeclared (it looks like it's only defined when __USE_POSIX).

However, the immediate problem I have seems to come from the fact that
on Linux at least we're basically lying to configure about what's in the
system headers when we go to compile. port/linux.h on my system defined
_GNU_SOURCE which forces most/all of the extension things to be defined
even if they wouldn't by the command line options.  So, the compilation
sees different contents of the headers than configure did which means that
configure may say that something isn't defined, but it might be when
we go and compile.

pgsql-admin by date:

Previous
From: "scott.marlowe"
Date:
Subject: Re: Fw: Case Insensitive Test
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Fw: Case Insensitive Test