Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> Bruce Momjian writes:
>
> > As part of my spinlock testing, I noticed that we test for __cpu__ when
> > using gcc, and __cpu when not using gcc. However, I see that my i386
> > gcc 2.95 defines both (shown using src/tools/ccsym):
>
> gcc only documents the __foo__ version, so there is a small reason to lean
> in that direction if you want to make it uniform.
Oh, that helps, so my logic of testing for only __foo__ on gcc, and both
when the compiler isn't gcc or isn't known is correct.
-- Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us pgman@candle.pha.pa.us | (610)
359-1001+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road + Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square,
Pennsylvania19073
